Supreme Court· 11/24/1879
Holden v. Trust Co.
Citations
- 100 U.S. 72
- 25 L. Ed. 567
- 1879 U.S. LEXIS 1805
- 10 Otto 72
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- finding that when an agreement of the parties extends no further than to the time fixed for the payment of the principal, if payment is not made when the money becomes due, the legal rate of interest will then apply
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Swayne
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
30 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- United States v. North CarolinaSupreme Court· 1890-05-19· cited 181×
- New Orleans v. WarnerSupreme Court· 1899-11-13· cited 82×
- Massachusetts Benefit Assn. v. MilesSupreme Court· 1891-01-19· cited 45×
- Union Institution for Savings v. City of BostonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1880-06-30· cited 30×
- Joyce Halling and Medcon Inc., a Utah corporation v. David A. Yovanovich and Ornella Dalla BonaWyoming Supreme Court· 2017-03-09· cited 29×
- Brown v. HardcastleCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1885-05-15· cited 24×
- Nashua & Lowell R. v. Boston & Lowell R.First Circuit· 1894-02-01· cited 24×
- Borders v. BarberSupreme Court of Missouri· 1884-04-15· cited 21×
- Ohio v. FrankSupreme Court· 1881-04-18· cited 19×
- Humphries v. Pittsburgh & Lake Erie RailroadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1984-04-27· cited 15×
- Smythe v. Inhabitants of New Providence TP.Third Circuit· 1920-03-09· cited 15×
- Murmann v. New York, New Haven & Hartford RailroadAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1931-11-06· cited 11×
- Shaw v. RigbyIndiana Supreme Court· 1882-11-15· cited 10×
- Hovey v. EdmisonSupreme Court of Dakota· 1884-10-15· cited 9×
- Martin v. the Star Publishing CompanySuperior Court of Delaware· 1954-09-14· cited 7×
- Prudence Co. v. Fidelity & Deposit Co. of MarylandSecond Circuit· 1935-06-10· cited 6×
- Sears v. Greater New York Development Co.D. Massachusetts· 1927-05-25· cited 5×
- Sears v. Greater New York Development Co.First Circuit· 1931-06-29· cited 4×
- Roll Ex Rel. Ralph D. Kaiser Co. v. Rothenberg (In Re Rothenberg)District of Columbia· 1996-09-03· cited 4×
- Boswell v. Big Vein Pocahontas Coal Co.W.D. Virginia· 1914-11-03· cited 3×
Cites
3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.