New Orleans v. Warner
Citations
- 175 U.S. 120
- 20 S. Ct. 44
- 44 L. Ed. 96
- 1899 U.S. LEXIS 1552
Syllabus
<p>Following the decisions of the Supreme Court of Louisiana, this court holds that the drainage warrants of the city of New Orleans, in question in this case, being neither bills of exchange, nor promissory notes, nor notes payable to order or bearer, nor effects negotiable by indorsement or delivery, are not included within the terms of Article '3540 of the Civil Code of Louisiana, prescribing certain actions therein named; and are not prescribed by the statutes of that State.</p> <p>The city of New Orleans, having voluntarily assumed the obligations of a trustee with respect to the fund to be raised by the collection of drainage assessments, cannot set up the prescription contained in Article 3547 of the Code against an application which, as such trustee, it had undertaken and had failed to perform — the rule being well settled that, in an action by a cestui que trust agginst an express trustee, the statute of limitations has no application, and no length of time is a bar.</p> <p>It is immaterial whether the assessments against the city itself for the drainage of public property were reduced to judgments or not: by reducing its own claim to judgment, it neither ceased to be debtor nor trustee.</p> <p>The judgment and decree in Peake v. New Orleans, 139 U. S. 342, cannot be considered as a controlling authority in this case, the facts being different, as shown in the opinion of the court in this case; and it would be inequitable to permit the city to set up that decision as an excuse for its failure to collect these assessments.</p> <p>A judgment for taxes does not differ from any other judgment in respect to its conclusiveness, and the city of New Orleans cannot, after the lapse of more than twenty years, question its liability upon the judgments against it for the amount' of these assessments.</p> <p>It was the intention of the amendment of 1874 to the constitution of Louisiana, limiting the power of New Orleans to contract debts thereafter, to validate the issu
Judges: Brown, Peckham, White
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
51 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- York v. Guaranty Trust Co. of New YorkSecond Circuit· 1944-03-02· cited 101×
- Pepsico, Inc. v. Federal Trade Commission, Pepsi-Cola Bottling Company of Corvallis, Inc., Plaintiff-Intervenor-Appellant v. Federal Trade CommissionSecond Circuit· 1972-11-20· cited 71×
- Arthur L. Tramel v. George SchraderFifth Circuit· 1975-01-06· cited 52×
- Benedict v. City of New YorkSupreme Court· 1919-06-02· cited 50×
- State v. ArroyoSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1980-03-25· cited 46×
- Ventura Consolidated Oil Fields v. RoganNinth Circuit· 1936-10-26· cited 39×
- Jewell v. City of SuperiorSeventh Circuit· 1904-10-06· cited 29×
- Ballester-Ripoll v. Court of Tax AppealsFirst Circuit· 1944-04-05· cited 27×
- Munro v. City of AlbuquerqueNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1943-12-16· cited 26×
- Edwards & Walsh Construction Co. v. Jasper CountySupreme Court of Iowa· 1902-05-31· cited 25×
- Sese v. United StatesCourt of Claims· 1953-07-13· cited 21×
- Mrs. Lealon (Lois) Cooley, Individually and as Tutrix, on Behalf of Her Minor Children, Etc. v. Strickland Transportation CompanyFifth Circuit· 1972-06-20· cited 20×
- Crist v. Town of GallupNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1947-03-19· cited 16×
- Yoerg v. Iowa Dairy Industry CommissionSupreme Court of Iowa· 1953-10-20· cited 15×
- Smythe v. Inhabitants of New Providence TP.Third Circuit· 1920-03-09· cited 15×
- Powell v. City of Ada, Okl.Tenth Circuit· 1932-09-26· cited 14×
- Lake Arthur Drainage Dist. v. FieldNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1921-06-20· cited 14×
- Newberry v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court· 1911-02-01· cited 13×
- Vickrey v. City of Sioux CityU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Northern Iowa· 1900-10-16· cited 13×
- Whittaker v. City of DeadwoodSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 1909-09-04· cited 12×
Cites
24 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Soon Hing v. CrowleySupreme Court· 1885-03-16· cited 342×
- Doyle v. Continental InsuranceSupreme Court· 1877-03-19· cited 164×
- United States v. Des Moines Navigation & Railway Co.Supreme Court· 1892-01-11· cited 94×
- Zeller's Lessee v. EckertSupreme Court· 1846-02-18· cited 83×
- Inhabitants of Worcester County v. Mayor of WorcesterMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1874-10-28· cited 67×
- Brewster v. WakefieldSupreme Court· 1860-02-20· cited 59×
- Holden v. Trust Co.Supreme Court· 1879-11-24· cited 42×
- Peake v. New OrleansSupreme Court· 1891-03-30· cited 34×
- Cumming v. Mayor of BrooklynNew York Court of Chancery· 1845-05-06· cited 33×
- State v. City of HartfordSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1882-05-15· cited 22×
- Ohio v. FrankSupreme Court· 1881-04-18· cited 19×
- Warner v. New OrleansSupreme Court· 1897-05-24· cited 19×
- Villavaso v. BarthetSupreme Court of Louisiana· 1887-03-15· cited 18×
- King Iron Bridge & Manufacturing Co. v. Otoe CountySupreme Court· 1888-01-30· cited 15×
- Gasquet v. Board of DirectorsSupreme Court of Louisiana· 1893-03-15· cited 12×
- New Orleans Draining Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana· 1856-04-15· cited 11×
- Succession of FarmerSupreme Court of Louisiana· 1880-10-15· cited 11×
- Charnock v. Fordoche & Grosse-Tête Special Levee District Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana· 1886-04-15· cited 9×
- Marquez v. City of New OrleansSupreme Court of Louisiana· 1858-05-15· cited 8×
- Correjolles v. Succession of FoucherSupreme Court of Louisiana· 1874-04-15· cited 6×
Other cases named New Orleans v. Warner
1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.