Skip to main content

Hogan v. State

Citations

  • 343 S.E.2d 770
  • 178 Ga. App. 534
  • 1986 Ga. App. LEXIS 1700

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • recognizing that “the crime of robbery requires proof that one, with the intent to commit theft, took property from the person or immediate presence of another by employment of one of the various alternative means enumerated in ... § 16-8-40(a
  • recognizing that “the crime of robbery requires proof that one, with the intent to commit theft, took property from the person or immediate presence of another by employment of one of the various alternative means enumerated in ... § 16-8-40(a)” (emphasis in original)
  • listing three elements of Georgia robbery, one of which lists all the delineated means of accomplishing it
  • alternative counts stating the various ways in which the single act of driving under the influence was alleged to have been committed
  • DUI per se requires proof only of the commission of proscribed specific act, without resort to any inference or presumption
  • “the requirement of proof that the driver be under the influence of alcohol to a degree which renders him less safe or incapable of safely driving”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Carley, Banke, Deen, McMurray, Birdsong, Sognier, Pope, Benham, Beasley

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

39 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.