Skip to main content

Ex Parte State

Citations

  • 528 So. 2d 1159
  • 1988 WL 75085

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • \Section 32-5A-191 (a)(1) and (2) are merely two different methods of proving the same offense — driving under the influence.\
  • \Section 32-5A-191 (a)(1) and (2) are merely two different methods of proving the same offense — driving under the influence [of alcohol]\
  • wherein the court refused to apply the harmless error doctrine to an amended charge where the defendant had not received notice of the charge he would be called upon to defend

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Maddox, Torbert

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

69 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

16 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.