Hogan v. Musolf

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that taxpayers, under Felder, need not exhaust administrative remedies before invoking jurisdiction of court
• DOR and Commission have authority in limited situations to determine whether application of Wisconsin taxing scheme passes constitutional muster
• agencies would become ineffectual if they lost their authority to review a case every time a constitutional claim is asserted
• ADOR has the “authority to determine whether ... the Wisconsin taxing scheme also violates federal law or the constitution.”
• ADOR has the \authority to determine whether ... the Wisconsin taxing scheme also violates federal law or the constitution.\
• federal Clean Water Act claim should have been brought in state administrative and court tribunals, not federal courts

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).