Stone v. Errecart

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that plaintiff challenging process for placement on registry for child abuse has liberty interest where she has alleged that she seeks, but will be unable to obtain, employment in child-care field
• affirming trial court's dismissal for plaintiffs' failure to comply with statutory-exhaustion requirement of 32 V.S.A. § 5887, under which taxpayer may challenge tax refund in superior court, but only after appealing under statutory scheme
• in tax appeals, statutory provision for appeal is exclusive remedy
• “Where the Legislature specifically mandates, exhaustion is required.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).