Idaho Supreme Court· 5/4/1981
Hoffman v. SV Co., Inc.
Citations
- 628 P.2d 218
- 102 Idaho 187
- 1981 Ida. LEXIS 320
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “improvements made by a party and upon which they rely for part performance must be substantial in relation to the value of the property”
- “A distinct understanding common to both parties is necessary in order for a contract to exist.”
- satisfaction of the doctrine of part performance entitles purchaser to specific performance
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Shepard, Bistline, Bakes, McFadden, Donaldson
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
43 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- P.O. Ventures, Inc. v. Loucks Family Irrevocable TrustIdaho Supreme Court· 2007-05-01· cited 68×
- Oregon Education Ass'n v. PhillipsOregon Supreme Court· 1986-10-21· cited 51×
- Bear Island Water Ass'n, Inc. v. BrownIdaho Supreme Court· 1994-04-21· cited 46×
- White v. RehnIdaho Supreme Court· 1982-04-15· cited 44×
- Loomis, Inc. v. CudahyIdaho Supreme Court· 1982-10-01· cited 37×
- Bob Daniels and Sons v. WeaverIdaho Court of Appeals· 1984-03-30· cited 34×
- Kirk v. Ford Motor Co.Idaho Supreme Court· 2005-06-23· cited 33×
- Scott v. CastleIdaho Court of Appeals· 1983-04-26· cited 33×
- Ray v. FrasureIdaho Supreme Court· 2009-01-30· cited 32×
- Schiewe v. FarwellIdaho Supreme Court· 1993-12-28· cited 29×
- Kline v. ClintonIdaho Supreme Court· 1982-05-07· cited 29×
- International Business MacHines Corp. v. LawhornIdaho Court of Appeals· 1984-02-29· cited 29×
- First Interstate Bank of Idaho, NA v. WestIdaho Supreme Court· 1984-12-24· cited 25×
- Wolford v. TankersleyIdaho Supreme Court· 1985-02-05· cited 22×
- Thompson v. PikeIdaho Supreme Court· 1992-08-17· cited 21×
- Mickelsen Construction, Inc. v. HorrocksIdaho Supreme Court· 2013-03-29· cited 20×
- Huyett v. Idaho State UniversityIdaho Supreme Court· 2004-12-07· cited 17×
- Potts Construction Co. v. North Kootenai Water DistrictIdaho Supreme Court· 2005-06-17· cited 16×
- Doyle v. OrtegaIdaho Supreme Court· 1994-04-20· cited 15×
- Jolley v. ClayIdaho Supreme Court· 1982-05-03· cited 14×
Cites
25 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Beckwith v. TalbotSupreme Court· 1877-12-10· cited 103×
- Anderson v. WhippleIdaho Supreme Court· 1951-01-30· cited 98×
- DeLuca v. C. W. Blakeslee & Sons, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1978-04-10· cited 86×
- Mitchell v. SiqueirosIdaho Supreme Court· 1978-07-05· cited 76×
- Boesiger v. FreerIdaho Supreme Court· 1963-05-14· cited 58×
- Montanaro v. PandolfiniSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1961-02-21· cited 40×
- Cougar Bay Co., Inc. v. BristolIdaho Supreme Court· 1979-07-23· cited 39×
- C. Forsman Real Estate Company v. HatchIdaho Supreme Court· 1976-03-03· cited 34×
- McMahon v. AugerIdaho Supreme Court· 1960-11-29· cited 27×
- Tew v. ManwaringIdaho Supreme Court· 1971-02-09· cited 25×
- Allen v. MoyleIdaho Supreme Court· 1961-12-26· cited 21×
- Turner v. MendenhallIdaho Supreme Court· 1973-05-25· cited 20×
- Dineen v. SullivanMontana Supreme Court· 1949-10-13· cited 20×
- Roundy v. WanerIdaho Supreme Court· 1977-10-27· cited 16×
- Cohodas v. RussellDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1974-01-23· cited 14×
- Barton v. DunlapIdaho Supreme Court· 1901-11-26· cited 13×
- Glockner v. TownHawaii Supreme Court· 1958-04-18· cited 10×
- Russell v. RussellIdaho Supreme Court· 1978-05-09· cited 9×
- Pettigrew v. DenwaltSupreme Court of Oklahoma· 1967-02-21· cited 8×
- Tucson v. FarringtonMichigan Supreme Court· 1976-04-01· cited 7×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.