Hoffman v. State
Citations
- 98 Ohio St. (N.S.) 137
Syllabus
<p>Constitutional lasa — Statute requiring accused to demand jury — Error proceedings — Record to show demand and refusal, etc. — Criminal law.</p> <p>1. Statutes providing in substance that before an accused shall be</p> <p>entitled to a jury in the trial of misdemeanors or petty offenses under municipal ordinances, where imprisonment is made a part of the penalty, he must demand the same, are not in any wise violative of the constitutional right to trial by jury.</p> <p>2. Under such statutes before error may be pros'ecuted to the action of the trial judge in trying the case without a jury, the record must show such demand and a refusal to grant the same.</p>
Judges: Donahue, Johnson, Jones, Matthias, Newman, Nichols, Wanamaker
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCites
7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Hopt v. People of Territory of UtahSupreme Court· 1884-03-03· cited 1,005×
- Lewis v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1892-12-05· cited 760×
- Schick v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1904-05-31· cited 260×
- State v. MaineSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1858-03-15· cited 26×
- State ex rel. Treasurer of State v. BowmanOhio Supreme Court· 1841-12-15· cited 21×
- United States v. RathboneU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York· 1828-06-15· cited 18×
- Neales v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri· 1847-03-15· cited 12×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.