D. Massachusetts· 12/26/2000
Hochen v. Bobst Group, Inc.
Citations
- 198 F.R.D. 11
- 48 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 1132
- 2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 19020
- 2000 WL 1910617
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- finding that the movant had standing to seek a Rule 11 motion where the plaintiffs had moved to add the movant to an amended complaint
- permitting a non- hands is an equitable principle that “generally has no application to an action at law for breach of contract.” Saggese v. Kelley, 445 Mass. 434, 444 (2005
- plaintiffs motion to add insurer as a party for the purpose of coercing larger settlement offer proper subject for Rule 11 sanctions
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Collings
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
5 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Nyer v. Winterthur InternationalFirst Circuit· 2002-05-16· cited 40×
- Hochen Ex Rel. Estate of Hochen v. Bobst Group, Inc.First Circuit· 2002-05-16· cited 31×
- M. Dematteo Construction Co. v. Century Indemnity Co.D. Massachusetts· 2001-10-03· cited 13×
- Lassman v. Reilly (In Re Feeley)D. Massachusetts· 2008-08-21· cited 6×
- Liquor Liability Joint Underwriting Ass'n v. Great American InsuranceMassachusetts Superior Court· 2003-04-14· cited 3×
Cites
10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Cooter & Gell v. Hartmarx Corp.Supreme Court· 1990-06-11· cited 4,510×
- Szabo Food Service, Inc. v. Canteen CorporationSeventh Circuit· 1987-08-25· cited 464×
- General William C. Westmoreland, Ambassador Richard Helms v. Cbs, Inc.D.C. Circuit· 1985-08-20· cited 268×
- Juan E. Cruz v. Robert Savage, Etc.First Circuit· 1990-02-20· cited 178×
- Greenberg v. SalaNinth Circuit· 1987-07-21· cited 92×
- Demeo v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceMassachusetts Appeals Court· 1995-05-16· cited 60×
- Port Drum Company v. Walter Umphrey and Kurt B. ChaconFifth Circuit· 1988-08-16· cited 51×
- New York News, Inc. v. KheelSecond Circuit· 1992-08-11· cited 34×
- General Motors Acceptance Corp. v. BatesFifth Circuit· 1992-03-04· cited 10×
- Unnamed caseNinth Circuit· 1990-09-28· cited 5×
Other cases named Hochen v. Bobst Group, Inc.
2 other CourtListener records share this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.