Skip to main content
· 5/16/2002

Nyer v. Winterthur International

Citations

  • 290 F.3d 456
  • 52 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 974
  • 59 Fed. R. Serv. 138
  • 2002 U.S. App. LEXIS 9213
  • 2002 WL 975683

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the safe harbor defense is waived for appellate purposes if not seasonably raised in the trial court
  • refusing to consider whether the safe-harbor provisions had been com- plied with because the issue had not been raised before the district court
  • “This provision is designed to allow an attorney to correct his error before a party commences Rule 11 7 proceedings.”
  • “This provision is designed to allow an attorney to correct - his error before a party commences Rule 11 7 proceedings.”
  • “[T]he legislature amended [C]hapter 93A, granting consumers a private cause of action against insurers who violate [C]hapter 176D.”
  • “As a general rule, non-parties to a case may not bring a motion 4 ||for sanctions pursuant to Rule 11,” except “[iJn limited circumstances”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Torruella, Stahl, Lynch

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.