Arizona Supreme Court· 5/12/1983
Hirsch v. National Van Lines, Inc.
Citations
- 666 P.2d 49
- 136 Ariz. 304
- 1983 Ariz. LEXIS 198
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- explaining that the scope of an appeal from a denial of a motion to set aside is restricted to the “questions raised by the motion”
- noting that the \scope of an appeal from a denial of a Rule 60 motion is restricted to the questions raised by the motion to set aside\
- noting an appeal from a default judgment is permissible when the default was not authorized by Rule 55 or when there are questions regarding personal jurisdiction
- requiring a meritorious defense when alleging excusable neglect under Civil Rule 60(b)(1)
- finding no reasonably prudent person would have failed to answer or request additional time to answer when the attorney could have seen an entry in a litigation log reminding him of the answer deadline and the attorney had the relevant documents in his possession but failed to timely answer
- “The scope of an appeal from a denial of a Rule 60 motion is restricted to the questions raised by the motion to set aside____”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Gordon, Holohan, Hays, Cameron, Feldman
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.