Arizona Supreme Court· 5/12/1983

Hirsch v. National Van Lines, Inc.

Citations

666 P.2d 49
136 Ariz. 304
1983 Ariz. LEXIS 198

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

explaining that the scope of an appeal from a denial of a motion to set aside is restricted to the “questions raised by the motion”
noting that the \scope of an appeal from a denial of a Rule 60 motion is restricted to the questions raised by the motion to set aside\
noting an appeal from a default judgment is permissible when the default was not authorized by Rule 55 or when there are questions regarding personal jurisdiction
requiring a meritorious defense when alleging excusable neglect under Civil Rule 60(b)(1)
finding no reasonably prudent person would have failed to answer or request additional time to answer when the attorney could have seen an entry in a litigation log reminding him of the answer deadline and the attorney had the relevant documents in his possession but failed to timely answer
“The scope of an appeal from a denial of a Rule 60 motion is restricted to the questions raised by the motion to set aside____”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Gordon, Holohan, Hays, Cameron, Feldman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

25 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

22 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named Hirsch v. National Van Lines, Inc.

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

Hirsch v. National Van Lines, Inc.
Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1982-06-09· cited 1×

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.