Hinds v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “the sentencing court did not specifically warn [the defendant] of the danger of deportation, but he was not prejudiced by the omission when the information was contained in the written plea agreement that [the defendant] testified he had read and understood”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Gonzalez
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2001-05-16· cited 4×
• Joseph v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2001-02-14· cited 3×
• Jones v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2001-10-30· cited 3×
• Chagoya v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2002-06-05· cited 1×
• Gomez v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2010-01-20
• Fagot v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1999-03-24
• Rojas v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1999-09-17
• Mongal v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2001-11-27
• Tijero v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2004-11-09

Cites

1 case in this archive is cited by this case.

• Hen Lin Lu v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1996-11-27· cited 17×