Himes v. Himes

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that it is well established that “property rights and interests [become] vested in the parties when they [agree] upon them, set them forth in a valid separation agreement, and [have] them incorporated into their final divorce decree”
• holding that it is well established that “property rights and interests [become] vested in the parties when they [agree] upon them, set them forth in a valid separation agreement, and [have] them incorporated into their final divorce decree”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Irwin v. Irwin
  Court of Appeals of Virginia· 2005-12-28· cited 40×
• Nicholson v. Nicholson
  Court of Appeals of Virginia· 1995-10-31· cited 13×
• Sandra D. T. Griffin v. David L. Griffin, c/o Kimberly Cowser-Griffin, etc.
  Court of Appeals of Virginia· 2014-01-28· cited 6×
• Cowser-Griffin v. Griffin (ORDER)
  Supreme Court of Virginia· 2015-02-26

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• McCarty v. McCarty
  Supreme Court· 1981-06-26· cited 1,052×
• Sawyer v. Sawyer
  Court of Appeals of Virginia· 1985-09-17· cited 42×
• Brushy Ridge Coal Co., Inc. v. Blevins
  Court of Appeals of Virginia· 1988-04-05· cited 38×
• Shoosmith v. Scott
  Supreme Court of Virginia· 1977-03-04· cited 28×
• Shoosmith v. Scott
  Supreme Court of Virginia· 1976-09-02· cited 21×
• Allison v. Allison
  Court of Appeals of Texas· 1985-05-22· cited 15×
• Bragan v. Bragan
  Court of Appeals of Virginia· 1987-08-04· cited 5×