Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 9/30/2003
Himes v. Himes
Citations
- 833 A.2d 1124
- 2003 Pa. Super. 370
- 2003 Pa. Super. LEXIS 3228
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding counsel’s failure to appear at a court proceeding prior to withdrawing under the rules is grounds for a finding of criminal contempt
- affirming finding of direct criminal contempt where hearing postponed due to attorney’s failure to appear
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Bender, Hudock, Tamilia
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
3 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Cooke v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1925-04-13· cited 880×
- Commonwealth v. MarconeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1980-02-01· cited 87×
- Commonwealth v. AshtonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2003-05-13· cited 49×
- Commonwealth v. KolanskySuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2002-05-14· cited 46×
- Williams v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1998-12-22· cited 33×
- Commonwealth v. OdomSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2000-11-01· cited 5×
Other cases named Himes v. Himes
3 other CourtListener records share this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.