Skip to main content

Hilton v. United States

Citations

  • 435 A.2d 383
  • 1981 D.C. App. LEXIS 358

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that counsel did not renew their motion for examination after the witness testified
  • describing nature of privacy interest as the potential harassment resulting from the examination or the likelihood that the witness may be deterred from coming forward

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Nebeker, MacK, Fer-Ren

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.