Hilliard v. Commonwealth

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that “[s]uspicion of illegal drug possession and distribution is a circumstance which gives rise to an inference of dangerousness” supporting a protective sweep
• \Suspicion of illegal drug possession and distribution is a circumstance which gives rise to an inference of dangerousness.\
• ‘Suspicion of illegal drug possession and distribution is a circumstance which gives rise to an inference of dangerousness.’
• “Suspicion of illegal drug possession and distribution is a circumstance which gives rise to an inference of dangerousness.”
• ‘Suspicion of illegal drug possession and distribution is a circumstance which gives rise to an inference of dangerousness.’
• `Suspicion of illegal drug possession and distribution is a circumstance which gives rise to an inference of dangerousness.'

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Mavin v. Commonwealth
  Court of Appeals of Virginia· 1999-12-14· cited 8×
• R.W. v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 2005-01-28· cited 8×
• State v. Bailey
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 2010-04-30· cited 7×
• RW v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 2005-01-28
• State v. Henry
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 2010-06-25

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Terry v. Ohio
  Supreme Court· 1968-06-10· cited 37,942×
• Coolidge v. New Hampshire
  Supreme Court· 1971-06-21· cited 9,038×
• Horton v. California
  Supreme Court· 1990-06-04· cited 2,923×
• Williams v. Commonwealth
  Court of Appeals of Virginia· 1987-03-17· cited 209×
• Harris v. Com.
  Supreme Court of Virginia· 1991-01-11· cited 89×
• Harmon v. Commonwealth
  Court of Appeals of Virginia· 1992-12-15· cited 74×
• Ruffin v. Commonwealth
  Court of Appeals of Virginia· 1991-09-24· cited 23×