Skip to main content

Hill v. Zoning Hearing Board

Citations

  • 597 A.2d 1245
  • 142 Pa. Commw. 539
  • 1991 Pa. Commw. LEXIS 531

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • striking conditions imposed by the Board because the zoning ordinance did not contain regulations pertaining to the imposed conditions and the Board was without the authority to do so
  • affirming condition limiting business hours of operation where supported by record evidence
  • “[I]t is the governing body of the municipality which has the power to enact laws to regulate land use pursuant to the police power.”
  • determination that use is expansion of prior nonconforming use is conclusion of law
  • determination that use is expansion of prior nonconforming use is conclusion of law
  • describing zoning boards as administrative in nature

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Smith, Pellegrini, Silvestri

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.