Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania· 9/27/1991
Hill v. Zoning Hearing Board
Citations
- 597 A.2d 1245
- 142 Pa. Commw. 539
- 1991 Pa. Commw. LEXIS 531
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- striking conditions imposed by the Board because the zoning ordinance did not contain regulations pertaining to the imposed conditions and the Board was without the authority to do so
- affirming condition limiting business hours of operation where supported by record evidence
- “[I]t is the governing body of the municipality which has the power to enact laws to regulate land use pursuant to the police power.”
- determination that use is expansion of prior nonconforming use is conclusion of law
- determination that use is expansion of prior nonconforming use is conclusion of law
- describing zoning boards as administrative in nature
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Smith, Pellegrini, Silvestri
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.