Omnipoint Corporation v. Zoning Hearing Board Of Pine Grove Township

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the general assertions of neighbors that the tower would be visible above the tree line and would damage property values did not constitute substantial evidence
• holding that a zoning board acted in a quasi-judicial capacity when it denied a conditional use permit
• noting that aesthetic considerations, as opposed to alleged health effects, are proper evidence under 47 U.S.C. § 332(c)(7)(B)(iii)
• reasoning a zoning hearing board acted in a quasi-judicial capacity when it denied an application for a special use permit
• reasoning a zoning hearing board acted in a quasi-judicial capacity when it denied an application for a special use permit
• declining to remand case when zoning board violated § 332(c)(7)(B)(iii) by failing to support its decision by substantial evidence and ordering board to issue zoning permits

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).