Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama· 3/19/2004
Hill v. Tucker
Citations
- 889 So. 2d 583
- 2004 Ala. Civ. App. LEXIS 220
- 2004 WL 541831
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- judgment final when amended complaint was untimely and denial of post-judgment motion that specifically requested leave to amend effectively denied leave to amend
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Pittman, Crawley, Thompson, Yates, Murdock
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
2 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Nunn v. BakerSupreme Court of Alabama· 1987-11-06· cited 356×
- Wallace v. TEE JAYS MFG. CO., INC.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama· 1997-02-28· cited 194×
- Ex Parte SmithSupreme Court of Alabama· 1983-09-23· cited 133×
- Singleton v. GrahamCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama· 1998-03-27· cited 48×
- Ex Parte Ford Motor Credit Co.Supreme Court of Alabama· 2000-05-19· cited 28×
- Ex Parte Allstate Life Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Alabama· 1999-08-13· cited 22×
- Newman v. NewmanCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama· 1999-09-03· cited 11×
- UNITED HANDICAPPED, ETC. v. Nat. Bank of CommerceCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama· 1980-03-05· cited 9×
- Kilgore v. Alabama By-Products Corp.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama· 1991-03-29· cited 9×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.