Supreme Court of Alabama· 9/23/1983

Ex Parte Smith

Citations

438 So. 2d 766

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that \it is the duty of an appellate court to consider lack of subject matter jurisdiction ex mero motu\
holding that \it is the duty of an appellate court to consider lack of subject matter jurisdiction ex mero motu\
holding that \[l]ack of subject matter jurisdiction may not be waived by the parties and it is the duty of an appellate court to consider lack of subject matter jurisdiction ex mero motu \
opining that, 'on appeal [for a trial de novo], the circuit court lack[s] subject matter jurisdiction to consider more than a final judgment over which the district court had subject matter jurisdiction'; citing State v. Pollock, 251 Ala. 603, 38 So. 2d 870 (1948
\[I]t is the duty of an appellate court to consider lack of subject matter jurisdiction ex mero motu .\
\[I]t is the duty of an appellate court to consider lack of subject matter jurisdiction ex mero motu .\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Embry

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

113 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.