Supreme Court of Arkansas· 3/6/1978
Hill v. State
Citations
- 263 Ark. 478
- 566 S.W.2d 127
- 1978 Ark. LEXIS 2028
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- deciding that regardless of merit of post-conviction petition, when allegations of ineffective assistance of counsel are raised, the \better practice\ is to appoint counsel \who does not practice law on a day to day basis with the lawyer against whom the allegations are made\
- appointing one public defender to represent on appeal a convicted person who is asserting that another public defender provided ineffective assistance of counsel at trial involves inevitable conflict of interest
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Byrd
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
8 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. LentzOhio Supreme Court· 1994-10-12· cited 173×
- People v. BanksIllinois Supreme Court· 1987-11-23· cited 68×
- Simpson v. StateSupreme Court of Rhode Island· 2001-04-04· cited 27×
- Dennis v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas· 2016-11-17· cited 7×
- Nelson v. StateAlaska Supreme Court· 2019-04-19· cited 5×
- Isom v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas· 2015-05-21· cited 3×
- Milsap v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky· 1984-01-13· cited 3×
- Glick v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas· 1978-06-12· cited 1×
Cites
1 case in this archive is cited by this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.