Skip to main content
· 12/29/2022

State v. Lentz

Citations

  • 2022 Ohio 4737

Syllabus

During the sentencing hearing, the trial court informed appellant of the applicable post-release control conditions as such, and because appellant remained in prison, the trial court could file a nunc pro tunc judgment entry to accurately reflect the post-release control conditions. The absence of a certificate of service on the nunc pro tunc order does not render the order void or otherwise effect its validity. And assuming that appellant was not notified of the nunc pro tunc order at the time it was filed, he was not prejudiced by this failure because he has had an opportunity to litigate his argument regarding the nunc pro tunc order. Judgment affirmed.

Judges: Tucker

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.