Court of Appeals of Georgia· 10/12/2011
Hill v. State
Citations
- 717 S.E.2d 523
- 312 Ga. App. 12
- 2011 Fulton County D. Rep. 3229
- 2011 Ga. App. LEXIS 877
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- recognizing that pre-arrest, pre-indictment delay raises due process concerns under the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments, while delay after arrest or indictment possibly implicates Sixth Amendment speedy trial protections
- recognizing that pre-arrest, pre- indictment delay raises due process concerns under the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendment, while delay after arrest or indictment possibly implicates Sixth Amendment speedy trial protections
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: McFadden, Phipps, Andrews
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
2 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Barker v. WingoSupreme Court· 1972-06-22· cited 12,108×
- United States v. MarionSupreme Court· 1971-12-20· cited 3,756×
- Ruffin v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 2008-06-30· cited 168×
- Bunn v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 2008-10-06· cited 62×
- Jackson v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 2005-06-16· cited 27×
- Jones v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 2008-09-22· cited 14×
- Manley v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 2007-01-08· cited 10×
- Moore v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 2004-10-12· cited 7×
- Billingslea v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 2011-08-24· cited 7×
- Holton v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 2006-06-26· cited 6×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.