Indiana Supreme Court· 1/19/1978
Hill v. State
Citations
- 371 N.E.2d 1303
- 267 Ind. 480
- 1978 Ind. LEXIS 585
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- permitting a police officer to testify that there were men’s clothes in the apartment of the defendant’s girlfriend, although he was not an expert on clothing
- \This Court has held that any witness may testify as to the appearance of an object observed. The fact that the police officer is not an expert in clothing goes to the weight and not the admissibility of his testimony.\ (citation omitted)
- \This Court has held that any witness may testify as to the appearance of an object observed. The fact that the police officer is not an expert in clothing goes to the weight and not the admissibility of his testimony.\ (citation omitted)
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Hunter, Pivarnik
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
40 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Poindexter v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1978-04-17· cited 116×
- Warren v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 2000-03-23· cited 96×
- Stroud v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 2004-05-25· cited 63×
- Chambers v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1979-08-08· cited 48×
- Watt v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 1980-11-03· cited 44×
- Davis v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1996-12-31· cited 41×
- Lucas v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1986-11-14· cited 39×
- Dooley v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1979-08-24· cited 33×
- Kern v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1981-12-22· cited 31×
- Priest v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1979-03-09· cited 26×
- Hunter v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1986-05-21· cited 26×
- Zimmerman v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 1984-10-02· cited 26×
- Staton v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 2006-09-06· cited 25×
- State v. LampmanCourt of Appeals of Iowa· 1982-08-30· cited 25×
- Lucas v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1980-12-18· cited 24×
- Norris v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1986-10-22· cited 21×
- Harper v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1985-02-22· cited 17×
- Smith v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1985-02-27· cited 16×
- Caccavallo v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1982-06-21· cited 16×
- Jefferson v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 1980-01-30· cited 16×
Cites
30 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court· 1966-06-13· cited 58,288×
- Griffin v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1965-04-28· cited 4,680×
- Griffin v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1965-06-07· cited 4,088×
- Pirtle v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1975-02-25· cited 210×
- United States v. Ralph Garguilo and Joseph MacChiaSecond Circuit· 1962-10-24· cited 167×
- New v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1970-06-19· cited 93×
- Cooper v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1972-07-19· cited 76×
- Becher v. United StatesSecond Circuit· 1924-12-08· cited 60×
- Scotty Shirley Hanks v. United StatesTenth Circuit· 1968-01-18· cited 54×
- Robertson v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1974-12-19· cited 52×
- Pearl Davis Bellard v. United StatesFifth Circuit· 1966-03-03· cited 46×
- United States v. Robert Schwartz and John J. PyneSeventh Circuit· 1968-08-14· cited 44×
- United States v. Norman WilliamsD.C. Circuit· 1975-10-23· cited 43×
- Gross v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1974-01-28· cited 42×
- United States v. George McGann and Harold Mote PruittFifth Circuit· 1970-11-17· cited 39×
- United States v. Joseph Richard WickSeventh Circuit· 1969-12-08· cited 36×
- Watson v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1957-02-06· cited 35×
- William G. Sullivan v. Palmer C. ScafatiFirst Circuit· 1970-06-30· cited 33×
- McGowan v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1977-09-06· cited 32×
- Birnbaum v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1925-03-16· cited 24×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.