Michigan Court of Appeals· 11/19/1990
Hill v. Kokosky
Citations
- 463 N.W.2d 265
- 186 Mich. App. 300
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- addressing several relevant considerations arising out of the circumstances of that case
- no duty owed by consulting doctor who did not have any contact with patient, did not see records relating to the case, and did not know patient’s name
- a treating physician’s solicitation of a doctor’s informal opinion is not, without more, sufficient to give rise to a physician-patient relationship between the patient and doctor consulted
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: McDonald, MacKenzie, Weaver
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
30 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Bryant v. Oakpointe Villa Nursing Centre, IncMichigan Supreme Court· 2004-07-30· cited 218×
- Reynolds v. Decatur Memorial HospitalAppellate Court of Illinois· 1996-01-04· cited 77×
- Lection v. DyllTex. App. Ct., 5th Dist. (Dallas)· 2001-06-20· cited 49×
- Lockridge v. Oakwood HospitalMichigan Court of Appeals· 2009-10-08· cited 40×
- Irvin Ex Rel. Irvin v. SmithSupreme Court of Kansas· 2001-09-21· cited 39×
- Kelley v. Middle Tennessee Emergency Physicians, P.C.Tennessee Supreme Court· 2004-04-23· cited 32×
- Oja v. KinMichigan Court of Appeals· 1998-07-29· cited 30×
- Bovara v. St. Francis HospitalAppellate Court of Illinois· 1998-08-20· cited 29×
- Lownsbury v. VanBurenOhio Supreme Court· 2002-02-20· cited 27×
- Gilbert v. MiodovnikDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2010-03-18· cited 24×
- Corbet v. McKinneyMissouri Court of Appeals· 1998-11-10· cited 23×
- Majzoub v. ApplingTex. App. Ct., 1st Dist. (Houston)· 2003-01-24· cited 20×
- Roberts v. HunterSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1993-02-01· cited 18×
- Schrader v. KohoutCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 1999-07-15· cited 17×
- Sterling v. Johns Hopkins HospitalCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2002-07-01· cited 16×
- Mead v. Legacy Health SystemOregon Supreme Court· 2012-07-26· cited 16×
- Weaver v. University of Michigan Board of RegentsMichigan Court of Appeals· 1993-08-16· cited 12×
- Gilinsky v. IndelicatoE.D. New York· 1995-07-28· cited 12×
- Nbd Bank, Na v. BarryMichigan Court of Appeals· 1997-07-16· cited 6×
- Newborn v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia· 2002-12-16· cited 6×
Cites
5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Moning v. AlfonoMichigan Supreme Court· 1977-06-15· cited 497×
- Duvall v. GoldinMichigan Court of Appeals· 1984-12-03· cited 73×
- Rogers v. HorvathMichigan Court of Appeals· 1975-11-14· cited 60×
- Ingber v. KandlerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1987-03-02· cited 10×
- Green Construction Co. v. Williams Form Engineering Corp.W.D. Michigan· 1980-09-10· cited 7×
Other cases named Hill v. Kokosky
1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.