Rogers v. Horvath

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that physician’s duty arises from physician-patient relationship and absent that relationship physician may not be subject to liability for malpractice
• holding that physician's duty arises from physician-patient relationship and absent that relationship physician may not be subject to liability for malpractice
• holding that absence of traditional physician-patient relationship precludes physician liability
• determining that physician retained by insurance carrier to conduct an IME had no physician-patient relationship with plaintiff who lost insurance benefits based on the results of the IME
• no cause of action where the defendant only examined the plaintiff for her employer in connection with a workers’ compensation hearing
• a doctor who neither advised nor treated plaintiff did not owe plaintiff a duty arising from a doctor patient relationship when the plaintiff lost benefits from an insurance company based on the doctor’s examination

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).