Skip to main content

Hill v. Hill

Citations

  • 619 A.2d 1086
  • 422 Pa. Super. 533
  • 1993 Pa. Super. LEXIS 456

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • superseded on other grounds by statute, Act of Dec. 18, 2013, P.L. 1167, No. 107, § 1 (amending 23 Pa.C.S. § 5328)
  • “The question [of consolidation] is one that must necessarily be left to the discretion of the trial judge ... ”
  • \The question [of consolidation] is one that must necessarily be left to the discretion of the trial judge ...\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Beck, Johnson, Hoffman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

11 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.