Hight v. Hight

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• applying California preclusion law pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1738

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

11 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Los Angeles Branch Naacp v. Los Angeles Unified School District
  Ninth Circuit· 1985-02-21· cited 118×
• Ruddock v. Ohls
  California Court of Appeal· 1979-03-29· cited 67×
• Carroll v. Puritan Leasing Co.
  California Court of Appeal· 1978-02-08· cited 46×
• Frances Ackerman v. Martin S. Ackerman
  Second Circuit· 1982-04-07· cited 12×
• Ackerman v. Ackerman
  S.D. New York· 1981-07-03· cited 12×
• J. R. Norton Co. v. Agricultural Labor Relations Board
  California Court of Appeal· 1987-06-15· cited 10×
• In Re Marriage of Doud
  California Court of Appeal· 1986-05-23· cited 9×
• In Re the Marriage of Young
  California Court of Appeal· 1990-09-27· cited 3×
• Peck v. Hagen
  California Court of Appeal· 1989-10-18· cited 2×
• Danko v. O'Reilly
  California Court of Appeal· 2014-12-18
• Thompson v. Crestbrook Insurance Company
  California Court of Appeal· 2022-07-14

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Slater v. Blackwood
  California Supreme Court· 1975-12-24· cited 252×
• Panos v. Great Western Packing Co.
  California Supreme Court· 1943-02-23· cited 143×
• Minton v. Cavaney
  California Supreme Court· 1961-09-05· cited 125×
• Greenfield v. Mather
  California Supreme Court· 1948-06-03· cited 65×
• Lynch v. Glass
  California Court of Appeal· 1975-01-29· cited 57×
• Jackson v. Jackson
  California Court of Appeal· 1967-08-30· cited 17×