Hicks v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• reversal and remand required where the appellant’s “pro se claims were not incorporated into his [ajmended [m]otion and were not considered and addressed by the motion court”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Ross v. State
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 2017-08-22· cited 4×
• Mitchell v. State
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 2017-08-31· cited 3×
• Hougardy v. State
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 2017-06-27· cited 2×
• BILLIE J. BORSCHNACK, Movant-Appellant v. STATE OF MISSOURI, Respondent-Respondent
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 2020-10-29

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Charles K. Moore v. State of Missouri
  Supreme Court of Missouri· 2015-04-14· cited 244×
• Luleff v. State
  Supreme Court of Missouri· 1991-04-09· cited 243×
• Sanders v. State
  Supreme Court of Missouri· 1991-04-09· cited 214×
• Travis M. Stanley v. State of Missouri
  Supreme Court of Missouri· 2014-02-04· cited 109×
• John Childers v. State of Missouri
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 2015-06-02· cited 58×
• Louis James Adams v. State of Missouri
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 2016-03-15· cited 16×
• Alyssa D. Bustamante v. State of Missouri
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 2015-09-29· cited 10×
• State v. Hicks
  Supreme Court of Missouri· 2013-02-26· cited 7×