Eighth Circuit· 12/20/1993
Hickey v. Reeder
Citations
- 12 F.3d 754
- 1993 WL 522820
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that the use of a stun gun on a non-violent inmate’s misconduct was “summary corporal punishment” that violated his right to be free from cruel and unusual punishment
- holding that use of a Taser against an inmate violated the Eighth Amendment
- noting that when used effectively, a stun gun “temporarily incapacitate[s] a threatening person, [giving] the officers involved momentary advantage and a chance to neutralize the threat”
- noting that when used effectively, a stun gun “temporarily incapacitated a threatening person, [giving] the officers involved momentary advantage and a chance to neutralize the threat”
- holding single use of stun gun against prisoner to compel compliance with order to sweep cell was excessive under the Eighth Amendment as a matter of law
- finding a taser’s use more than de minimis only “if inflicted without legitimate reason ” (emphasis added)
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Beam, Bowman, Heaney
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
62 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Bilal v. DriverEleventh Circuit· 2001-05-23· cited 721×
- Cindy Abbott v. Sangamon CountySeventh Circuit· 2013-01-29· cited 604×
- Bryan v. MacPhersonNinth Circuit· 2010-06-18· cited 459×
- Heriberto Rodriguez v. County of Los AngelesNinth Circuit· 2018-05-30· cited 457×
- Lewis v. DowneySeventh Circuit· 2009-09-04· cited 383×
- Brown v. City of Golden ValleyEighth Circuit· 2009-07-22· cited 380×
- Irving v. DormireEighth Circuit· 2008-03-07· cited 339×
- Kosilek v. SpencerFirst Circuit· 2014-12-16· cited 238×
- Robert Shreve v. Franklin Cnty., OhioSixth Circuit· 2014-02-06· cited 233×
- Estate of Armstrong Ex Rel. Armstrong v. Village of PinehurstFourth Circuit· 2016-01-11· cited 158×
- Thomas A. Munz v. Tobin Michael, Deputy U.S. Marshal Kirk Papenthien, Deputy U.S. Marshal, David R. Hansen, U.S. District JudgeEighth Circuit· 1994-07-01· cited 124×
- Orem v. RephannFourth Circuit· 2008-04-28· cited 123×
- Johnson v. BlaukatEighth Circuit· 2006-06-27· cited 116×
- Madrid v. GomezN.D. California· 1995-01-10· cited 115×
- McKenney v. HarrisonEighth Circuit· 2011-03-28· cited 105×
- R.D. Jones v. Thuworn ShieldsEighth Circuit· 2000-03-23· cited 102×
- Danelle Hollingsworth v. City of St. AnnEighth Circuit· 2015-09-03· cited 93×
- Walker v. BowersoxEighth Circuit· 2008-05-30· cited 79×
- Cook v. City of Bella VillaEighth Circuit· 2009-10-02· cited 79×
- Dwain Smith v. Conway County, ArkansasEighth Circuit· 2014-07-16· cited 65×
Cites
12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Hudson v. McMillianSupreme Court· 1992-02-25· cited 8,199×
- Whitley v. AlbersSupreme Court· 1986-03-04· cited 6,155×
- Robert Michenfelder v. George Sumner Lieutenant Koon C/o Horn C/o Leslie Sgt Jenae Holmes Sgt Stuffelbeam James ParkerNinth Circuit· 1988-10-26· cited 403×
- Jordan v. GardnerNinth Circuit· 1993-02-25· cited 305×
- Soto v. DickeySeventh Circuit· 1984-09-20· cited 242×
- John Allen Caldwell v. Woodford County Chief Jailer, James Moore, Harry Stephen Tracy Rick Adkins Daniel E. Clark W. Keith BroughtonSixth Circuit· 1992-07-01· cited 177×
- Anthony Ort v. Warden J.D. White, Ron Sutton, Tony Holliday, Officer Truman Mitman, Captain Shoemaker and J.W. TauntonEleventh Circuit· 1987-05-05· cited 114×
- Jones v. MabryEighth Circuit· 1983-11-30· cited 62×
- James D. Stenzel v. Jim Ellis, Jailer, Pat Adams and Lynn F. Jacobs, All Sued in Their Official and Individual CapacitiesEighth Circuit· 1990-10-08· cited 42×
- Moody v. ProctorEighth Circuit· 1993-02-17· cited 29×
- Jasper v. ThalackerEighth Circuit· 1993-07-19· cited 18×
- Porth v. FarrierEighth Circuit· 1991-05-22· cited 16×
Other cases named Hickey v. Reeder
1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.