Skip to main content
Eighth Circuit· 12/20/1993

Hickey v. Reeder

Citations

  • 12 F.3d 754
  • 1993 WL 522820

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the use of a stun gun on a non-violent inmate’s misconduct was “summary corporal punishment” that violated his right to be free from cruel and unusual punishment
  • holding that use of a Taser against an inmate violated the Eighth Amendment
  • noting that when used effectively, a stun gun “temporarily incapacitate[s] a threatening person, [giving] the officers involved momentary advantage and a chance to neutralize the threat”
  • noting that when used effectively, a stun gun “temporarily incapacitated a threatening person, [giving] the officers involved momentary advantage and a chance to neutralize the threat”
  • holding single use of stun gun against prisoner to compel compliance with order to sweep cell was excessive under the Eighth Amendment as a matter of law
  • finding a taser’s use more than de minimis only “if inflicted without legitimate reason ” (emphasis added)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Beam, Bowman, Heaney

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

62 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named Hickey v. Reeder

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.