Skip to main content
· 11/14/1984

Hiatt v. Schreiber

Citations

  • 599 F. Supp. 1142

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that insurance agents fell within long-arm statute providing that “one contracting to insure property located in Colorado is subject to jurisdiction in Colorado” even though agents “are not the insurers per se but only insurance agents”
  • “Colorado courts have followed the trend established in California recognizing a separate cause of action sounding in tort for bad faith breach of insurance contracts.”
  • failure to make timely payment of P.I.P. benefits

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Kane

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.