Skip to main content
· 3/23/1993

Fostvedt v. United States, Internal Revenue Service

Citations

  • 824 F. Supp. 978
  • 71 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 1571
  • 1993 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 8841
  • 1993 WL 213351

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • discussing the importance of clear pleadings to allow defendants to effectively conduct discovery and defend themselves
  • finding the disclosure of “such minimal, ‘nonsensitive’ facts as the taxpayer’s name” during an investigation was necessary
  • discussing the importance of clear pleadings to allow defendants to effectively conduct discovery and defend 31 themselves
  • holding plaintiff's complaint to the Rule 8(a) pleading standard
  • holding plaintiff’s complaint to the Rule 8(a) pleading standard
  • “Based on [the plaintiff’s] conclusory, nebulous claim, the United States can have no way of knowing what discovery it should produce.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Sherman G. Finesilver

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.