Skip to main content
Federal Claims· 7/8/1997

Heydt v. United States

Citations

  • 38 Fed. Cl. 286
  • 41 Cont. Cas. Fed. 77,173
  • 1997 U.S. Claims LEXIS 139
  • 1997 WL 378995

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding liability under the Fifth Amendment for the Government’s occupation and use of a private facility because no implied-in-fact contract existed
  • proper measure of just compensation for a temporary taking is the fair market rental value of the property
  • proper measure of just compensation for a temporary taking is the fair market rental value of the property
  • “The Government’s silence, or lack of response, cannot constitute an acceptance of [plaintiff’s] demands for payment.”
  • proper measure of just compensation for a temporary taking is the fair market rental value of the property
  • “[T]he mere conferring of a benefit on the government does not create an implied-in-fact contractual relationship. Implied-in-fact contracts require conduct of the parties manifesting assent.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Yock

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.