Federal Claims· 7/8/1997
Heydt v. United States
Citations
- 38 Fed. Cl. 286
- 41 Cont. Cas. Fed. 77,173
- 1997 U.S. Claims LEXIS 139
- 1997 WL 378995
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- finding liability under the Fifth Amendment for the Government’s occupation and use of a private facility because no implied-in-fact contract existed
- proper measure of just compensation for a temporary taking is the fair market rental value of the property
- proper measure of just compensation for a temporary taking is the fair market rental value of the property
- “The Government’s silence, or lack of response, cannot constitute an acceptance of [plaintiff’s] demands for payment.”
- proper measure of just compensation for a temporary taking is the fair market rental value of the property
- “[T]he mere conferring of a benefit on the government does not create an implied-in-fact contractual relationship. Implied-in-fact contracts require conduct of the parties manifesting assent.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Yock
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
15 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Gargoyles, Inc. v. United StatesFederal Claims· 1999-10-15· cited 18×
- Allenfield Associates v. United StatesFederal Claims· 1998-03-02· cited 13×
- Central Pines Land Co. v. United StatesFederal Claims· 2010-12-20· cited 8×
- Alameda Gateway, Ltd. v. United StatesFederal Claims· 1999-12-23· cited 7×
- Otay Mesa Property L.P. v. United StatesFederal Claims· 2010-06-30· cited 7×
- Wilkinson v. Bd. of University and School Lands of the State of N.D.North Dakota Supreme Court· 2022-11-10· cited 6×
- Schenectady Industrial Corp. v. Upstate Textiles, Inc.N.D. New York· 2010-01-25· cited 5×
- Lopes v. City of PeabodyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1999-11-03· cited 5×
- Home Federal Bank of Tennessee, F.S.B. v. United StatesFederal Claims· 2003-08-26· cited 5×
- Jones v. United StatesFederal Claims· 2001-06-07· cited 4×
- Martin v. United StatesFederal Claims· 2012-01-13· cited 4×
- Spodek v. United States Postal ServiceD. Massachusetts· 1999-02-09· cited 1×
- YRC, Inc. v. United StatesFederal Claims· 2010-12-16· cited 1×
- Memmer v. United StatesFederal Claims· 2020-11-02
- In Re Upstream Addicks and Barker (Texas) Flood-Control Reservoirs v. United StatesFederal Claims· 2022-10-28
Cites
56 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Federal Crop Ins. Corp. v. MerrillSupreme Court· 1947-11-10· cited 1,581×
- First English Evangelical Lutheran Church v. County of Los AngelesSupreme Court· 1987-06-09· cited 1,264×
- United States v. General Motors Corp.Supreme Court· 1945-04-02· cited 900×
- United States v. DickinsonSupreme Court· 1947-06-16· cited 505×
- Kimball Laundry Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1949-06-27· cited 443×
- City of El Centro v. The United StatesFederal Circuit· 1990-12-28· cited 333×
- Yuba Natural Resources, Inc. v. The United States, Defendant/cross-AppellantFederal Circuit· 1990-07-06· cited 301×
- Algonac Manufacturing Co. v. United StatesCourt of Claims· 1970-07-15· cited 175×
- William A. Ransom and Robert D. Nesen v. The United StatesFederal Circuit· 1990-04-05· cited 122×
- Mega Construction Co. v. United StatesFederal Claims· 1993-08-27· cited 107×
- United States v. Whitney Benefits, Inc.Supreme Court· 1991-11-04· cited 81×
- Whitney Benefits, Inc. And Peter Kiewit Sons' Co. v. The United StatesFederal Circuit· 1991-05-06· cited 80×
- Pacific Gas & Electric Co. v. United StatesCourt of Claims· 1983-08-30· cited 79×
- In the Matter of Penn Central Transportation Company. Appeal of United States of AmericaThird Circuit· 1987-10-22· cited 65×
- 767 Third Avenue Associates and Sage Realty Corporation v. United StatesThird Circuit· 1995-03-03· cited 54×
- LaChance v. United StatesCourt of Claims· 1988-06-29· cited 47×
- Singleton v. United StatesCourt of Claims· 1984-08-01· cited 39×
- Whitney Benefits, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Claims· 1989-10-13· cited 36×
- Essen Mall Properties v. United StatesCourt of Claims· 1990-09-17· cited 32×
- Cuban Truck & Equipment Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1965-10-11· cited 32×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.