Hewitt v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that even though the State failed to address all of the appellant’s issues, the issues were meritless and were being raised for the first time on appeal
• concluding that when “victim” was not defined in statute, the term connotes passivity in that harm is unexpected and insurer cannot “be said to have suffered an unexpected harm or financial loss”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Mulder v. State
  Nevada Supreme Court· 2000-01-18· cited 86×
• Leonard v. State
  Nevada Supreme Court· 1998-12-09· cited 80×
• Thomas v. State
  Nevada Supreme Court· 1998-11-25· cited 53×
• State v. Alford
  Tennessee Supreme Court· 1998-06-15· cited 52×
• Barton v. State
  Nevada Supreme Court· 2001-09-12· cited 32×
• Martinez v. State
  Nevada Supreme Court· 1999-02-12· cited 24×
• Hill v. State
  Nevada Supreme Court· 1998-02-26· cited 18×
• State v. Westerman
  Court of Appeals of Utah· 1997-09-18· cited 10×
• Byars v. State
  Nevada Supreme Court· 2014-10-16

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Etcheverry v. State
  Nevada Supreme Court· 1991-11-04· cited 36×
• Igbinovia v. State
  Nevada Supreme Court· 1995-05-25· cited 17×
• Bonacci v. State
  Nevada Supreme Court· 1980-12-18· cited 13×
• Botts v. State
  Nevada Supreme Court· 1993-06-21· cited 12×
• Rhodes v. State
  Nevada Supreme Court· 1975-11-12· cited 5×
• Keefe v. Sheriff
  Nevada Supreme Court· 1977-03-09· cited 2×