Hertz Corp. v. Pugh

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• rejecting the argument that the parties did not intend for insurance to cover an accident where the named insured committed no negligence, noting that the policy contained no specific exclusion to that effect

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

10 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Trizec Properties, Inc. v. Biltmore Construction Co.
  Eleventh Circuit· 1985-08-05· cited 58×
• Nat. Merchandise Co., Inc. v. United Serv. Auto. Ass'n
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1981-06-17· cited 54×
• Morgan v. Continental Cas. Co.
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1980-04-18· cited 18×
• Truck Discount Corp. v. Serrano
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1978-08-09· cited 9×
• LEASING, INC. v. Heider
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1979-06-19· cited 8×
• Racecon, Inc. v. Mead
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1980-08-27· cited 5×
• Container Corp. v. McKenzie Tank Lines
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1996-04-23· cited 4×
• MIAMI STAGE LIGHTING v. Budget Rent-A-Car
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1998-06-10· cited 4×
• Crabtree v. Hertz Corp.
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1984-12-14· cited 2×
• Unnamed case
  Third Circuit· 1985-08-05

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• University Plaza Shopping Center, Inc. v. Stewart
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1973-01-24· cited 87×
• Rigel v. National Casualty Company
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1954-12-07· cited 72×
• New Amsterdam Casualty Company v. Addison
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1964-10-21· cited 50×
• Nixon v. United States Fidelity and Guaranty Co.
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1973-10-03· cited 18×
• Pafford v. Standard Life Ins. Co. of Indiana
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1951-06-08· cited 14×