Nixon v. United States Fidelity and Guaranty Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “products–completed operations” exclusion in general contractor’s liability policy did not preclude coverage and noting the “significance that [the insured] is engaged in the general contracting business; he is not a manufacturer or seller of goods or products”
• products-completed operation hazard did not operate to deny coverage to general contractor who provided a service and was not a manufacturer or seller of goods when brick wall injured child

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).