Skip to main content

Hersh v. Kentfield Builders, Inc.

Citations

  • 189 N.W.2d 286
  • 385 Mich. 410
  • 48 A.L.R. 3d 353
  • 1971 Mich. LEXIS 199

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that whether the defendant employer knew or should have known of its employee’s dangerous propensities, and therefore should be held liable for the employee’s criminal assault, was a question for the jury
  • stating that, whether the defendant employer knew or should have known of its employee’s dangerous propensities and, therefore, should be held liable for the employee’s criminal assault, was a question for the jury
  • stating that, whether the defendant employer knew or should have known of its employee's dangerous propensities and, therefore, should be held liable for the employee's criminal assault, was a question for the jury
  • tort cause of action is available to “a customer who came to the employer’s place of business”
  • negligence case focusing on whether employer should have known employee’s propensities
  • unprovoked assault of salesman by employee of defendant

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Kavanagh, Adams, Brennan, Swainson, Williams, Black

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

37 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named Hersh v. Kentfield Builders, Inc.

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.