Skip to main content

Herron v. Seizak

Citations

  • 468 A.2d 803
  • 321 Pa. Super. 466
  • 1983 Pa. Super. LEXIS 4446

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that grandparents lacked standing to sue for visitation because case did not fall under one of three circumstances in which the statute provides grandparents with rights to sue
  • grandparents have no right to visit child where neither parent was deceased, parents’ marriage was not dissolved, and child had not resided with grandparent for 12 months or more
  • grandparents have no right to visit child where neither parent was deceased, parents' marriage was not dissolved, and child had not resided with grandparent for 12 months or more
  • grandparents lack standing where both parents are present and object to visitation
  • “[A]ppellants ... would have the court direct parents, both of whom have chosen not to have their children visit the grandparents, to permit such visitation. Nothing in the case or statutory law legitimizes such an intrusion by the courts into family life.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Brosky, McEwen, Beck

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

22 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named Herron v. Seizak

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.