Herring v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• \It is apparent that the purpose of sections 316.027 and 316.062 is to assure that any injured person is rendered aid and that all pertinent information concerning insurance and names of those involved in the traffic accident is exchanged by the parties.\
• “It is apparent that the purpose of sections 316.027 and 316.062 is to assure that any injured person is rendered aid and that all pertinent information concerning insurance and names of those involved in the traffic accident is exchanged by the parties.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Dumas
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1997-10-23· cited 24×
• State of Florida v. Zachariah Dorsett
  Supreme Court of Florida· 2015-02-26· cited 16×
• Wishop v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1986-07-17· cited 1×
• Deontae Palinski Johnson v. State of Florida
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2020-09-14

Cites

3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Redondo v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1981-07-23· cited 75×
• Thomas v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1983-05-04· cited 2×
• State v. Murray
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1983-01-26· cited 1×