New Mexico Court of Appeals· 1/4/1999
Herrera v. Herrera
Citations
- 974 P.2d 675
- 126 N.M. 705
- 1999 NMCA 034
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- observing that “[a]ll settlement agreements are contracts and therefore are subject to contract law”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Alarid, Donnelly, Armijo
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
15 cases in this archive cite this case.
- New Mexico Right to Choose/NARAL v. JohnsonNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1999-06-23· cited 181×
- Garcia v. JeantetteNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 2003-09-23· cited 37×
- Ottino v. OttinoNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 2001-03-23· cited 36×
- Madrid v. MarquezNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 2001-09-19· cited 26×
- Bustos v. BustosNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 2000-03-27· cited 20×
- In Re the Marriage of TakusagawaCourt of Appeals of Kansas· 2007-09-07· cited 17×
- Cortez v. CortezNew Mexico Supreme Court· 2009-02-20· cited 16×
- Lightsey v. MarshallNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1999-10-05· cited 13×
- Ellen Equipment Corp. v. C v. Consultants & Associates, Inc.New Mexico Court of Appeals· 2008-02-07· cited 13×
- Thomas P. Gibson v. L.D. \Poke\ Arnold, Deborah A. ArnoldTenth Circuit· 2002-05-01· cited 12×
- Beaver v. BrumlowNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 2010-03-04· cited 10×
- Quarrie v. N.M. Inst. of Mining & Tech.New Mexico Court of Appeals· 2020-08-03· cited 8×
- Cortez v. CortezNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 2007-10-09· cited 5×
- In Re PfiesterD. New Mexico· 2011-01-24· cited 3×
- Cortez v. CortezNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 2007-11-20· cited 3×
Cites
18 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Texaco, Inc., Plaintiff-Counter-Claim-Defendant-Appellant v. William R. Ponsoldt, Defendant-Counter-Claimant-AppelleeNinth Circuit· 1991-07-25· cited 255×
- Ruggles v. RugglesNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1993-08-16· cited 69×
- Nicholson v. BarabCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1991-09-13· cited 42×
- Navajo Tribe of Indians v. Hanosh Chevrolet-Buick, Inc.New Mexico Supreme Court· 1988-02-02· cited 32×
- Paulos v. JanetakosNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1937-09-28· cited 28×
- Gonzales v. AtnipNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1984-11-29· cited 23×
- Alvarez v. AlvarezNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1963-07-01· cited 21×
- English v. Standard Optical Co.Court of Appeals of Utah· 1991-06-25· cited 21×
- Bentley v. PotterUtah Supreme Court· 1984-12-27· cited 20×
- Monsanto v. MonsantoNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1995-04-20· cited 19×
- Richardson v. RichardsonCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1986-04-22· cited 18×
- Nashan v. NashanNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1995-02-24· cited 16×
- Jones v. United Minerals Corp.New Mexico Supreme Court· 1979-12-26· cited 14×
- Gangopadhyay v. GangopadhyayWest Virginia Supreme Court· 1991-02-13· cited 13×
- Hall v. HallCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1990-07-26· cited 12×
- Tellez v. TellezNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1947-10-15· cited 10×
- Christiansen v. ChristiansenNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1983-07-20· cited 5×
- Cleveland v. ClevelandCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1977-12-29· cited 2×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.