First Circuit· 6/15/2020

Hernandez Lara v. Barr

Citations

962 F.3d 45

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

stating that a party cannot use the 28(j) process \to introduce new arguments that [it] failed to raise in its brief\
explaining that, even though an IJ’s “denial of a continuance” is “ordinarily” reviewed “for abuse of discretion,” an assertion that such a denial violated a noncitizen’s “statutory right to counsel presents a legal question warranting plenary review”
“In the United States, an INTERPOL Red Notice alone is not a sufficient basis to arrest the ‘subject’ of the notice ‘because it does not meet the requirements for arrest under the 4th Amendment to the Constitution.’” (citation omitted)
“[D]ata shows that detention significantly decreases the ability of respondents in immigration proceedings to obtain counsel.” (citing Ingrid V. Eagly & Steven Shafer, A National Study of Access to Counsel in Immigration Court, 164 U. Pa. L. Rev. 1, 32 (2015)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

28 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.