Hensel v. US Electronics Corporation

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “If there is failure to consideration, even though the contract be under seal, then the contract is unenforceable because some supervening cause has made performance impossible.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

10 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Monroe Park v. Metropolitan Life Insurance
  Supreme Court of Delaware· 1983-02-04· cited 70×
• Haft v. Dart Group Corp.
  D. Delaware· 1993-12-30· cited 24×
• Husband (P.J.O.) v. Wife (L.O.)
  Supreme Court of Delaware· 1980-06-25· cited 12×
• Federal Deposit Ins. Corp. v. Hinkson
  D. Delaware· 1987-08-14· cited 5×
• Southeastern Chester County Refuse Authority v. BFI Waste Service of Pennsylvania, LLC.
  Superior Court of Delaware· 2015-06-01
• CPC Mikawaya Holdings, LLC v. MyMo Intermediate, Inc.
  Court of Chancery of Delaware· 2022-06-29
• Official Comm. of Unsecured Creditors v. Meltzer
  D. Maine· 2018-05-08
• Alchemy Ltd LLC v. FANchise League Company, LLC
  Court of Chancery of Delaware· 2023-07-20
• CFGI, LLC v. Common C. Holding LP
  Superior Court of Delaware· 2024-01-29
• Biglari Holdings Inc. v. Funston
  Superior Court of Delaware· 2025-11-26

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Massachusetts Bonding & Insurance
  Superior Court of Delaware· 1939-10-09· cited 16×
• Stabler v. Ramsay
  Court of Chancery of Delaware· 1948-11-23· cited 15×
• Modern Dust Bag Co. v. Commercial Trust Co.
  Court of Chancery of Delaware· 1954-04-07· cited 7×
• Chrysler Motors Corp. v. Tom Livizos Real Estate, Inc.
  Court of Chancery of Delaware· 1965-04-07· cited 2×

Other cases named Hensel v. US Electronics Corporation

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

• Hensel v. US ELECTRONICS CORPORATION
  Superior Court of Delaware· 1969-03-07· cited 1×