Henry v. Cockrell

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Absent special circumstances, a federal habeas petitioner must exhaust his state remedies by pressing his claims in state court before he may seek federal habeas relief.”
• “Absent special circumstances, a federal habeas petitioner must exhaust his state remedies by pressing his claims in state court before he may seek federal habeas relief.”
• “Absent special circumstances, a federal habeas petitioner must exhaust his state remedies by pressing his claims in state court before he may seek federal habeas relief.”
• “Absent special circumstances, a federal habeas petitioner must exhaust his state remedies by pressing his claims in state court before he may seek federal habeas relief.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Ramirez v. Dretke
  Fifth Circuit· 2005-01-27· cited 95×
• Moore v. Quarterman
  Fifth Circuit· 2008-07-07· cited 86×
• Bagwell v. Dretke
  Fifth Circuit· 2004-06-09· cited 75×
• Bartee v. Quarterman
  W.D. Texas· 2008-08-06· cited 6×
• Berkley v. Quarterman
  W.D. Texas· 2007-08-24· cited 6×
• Wood v. Dretke
  W.D. Texas· 2005-08-24· cited 5×
• Blanton v. Quarterman
  W.D. Texas· 2007-06-01· cited 5×
• Garcia v. Director, TDCJ-CID
  E.D. Texas· 2014-11-10· cited 2×
• Henry v. Dretke, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
  Supreme Court· 2003-10-14

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Slack v. McDaniel
  Supreme Court· 2000-04-26· cited 41,291×
• Miller-El v. Cockrell
  Supreme Court· 2003-02-25· cited 27,550×
• Anderson v. Harless
  Supreme Court· 1982-11-01· cited 1,550×
• Conrado Vela v. W.J. Estelle, Jr., Director, Texas Department of Corrections
  Fifth Circuit· 1983-07-05· cited 131×
• Wilder v. Cockrell
  Fifth Circuit· 2001-11-26· cited 117×
• Orman v. Cain
  Fifth Circuit· 2000-10-11· cited 55×
• Ladd v. Cockrell
  Fifth Circuit· 2002-10-24· cited 47×