Direx Israel, Ltd. Direx, Incorporated v. Breakthrough Medical Corporation Zvi Porath Avner Spector

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• observing that the standard for obtaining a preliminary injunction is higher than the standard for surviving summary judgment
• stating that the abuse of discretion standard \is not a rule of perfunctory appellate review but one of careful scrutiny\
• concluding that the district court's determination that the balance of hardships favored plaintiffs based on its finding that plaintiffs were likely to succeed on the merits \was clear error in the application of the hardship test\
• concluding that the district court's determination that the balance of hardships favored plaintiffs based on its finding that plaintiffs were likely to succeed on the merits \was clear error in the application of the hardship test\
• stating that the abuse of discretion standard “is not a rule of perfunctory appellate review but one of careful scrutiny”
• noting that the basis of injunctive relief in the federal courts has always been irreparable harm and inadequacy of legal remedies.

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).