Skip to main content

Henry Block Co. v. Papania

Citations

  • 121 La. 683
  • 46 So. 694
  • 1908 La. LEXIS 738

Syllabus

<p>Pbesceiption — Accounts—Pabol Evidence.</p> <p>The object and effect of Act No. 78, p. 86, of 1888, amending article 3538 of the Revised Civil Code, is not to prohibit proof of an interruption of the prescription running upon accounts sued on which are governed by that prescription by reason of parol evidence, but to prevent such evidence, when received, having the effect of shifting the prescription of three years applicable to those accounts to a prescription of ten years.</p> <p>Monroe, J., dissenting.</p> <p>(Syllabus by the Court.)</p>

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that failure to perform job duties was a legitimate, nondiscriminatory reason for termination

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Monroe, Nicholls

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.