New Jersey Superior Court App Division· 4/7/1987
Henker v. Preybylowski
Citations
- 524 A.2d 455
- 216 N.J. Super. 513
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that the cumulative effect of inappropriate comments by plaintiff's counsel, including remarks on motives and trustworthiness of defense counsel, \probably\ entitled defendant to a new trial
- remittitur not substitute for new trial when verdict is the product of prejudice, partiality or passion
- new trial on damages ordered where otherwise inflammatory closing statement included baseless accusation that defendant acted in bad faith to defeat plaintiffs' liability and damage claims
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Judges Antell, Brody and D'annunzio
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
29 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Caldwell v. HaynesSupreme Court of New Jersey· 1994-07-06· cited 136×
- Jastram Ex Rel. Jastram v. KruseSupreme Court of New Jersey· 2008-12-23· cited 67×
- Fertile v. St. Michael's Medical CenterSupreme Court of New Jersey· 2001-07-25· cited 66×
- State v. RhodesSupreme Court of Missouri· 1999-04-13· cited 62×
- Tomaino v. BurmanNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 2003-11-20· cited 59×
- Jackowitz v. LangNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 2009-07-31· cited 44×
- Geler v. AkawieNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 2003-03-03· cited 44×
- Velop, Inc. v. KaplanNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1997-05-19· cited 40×
- Jackson v. Consolidated Rail Corp.New Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1988-03-10· cited 32×
- Ming Yu He v. MillerSupreme Court of New Jersey· 2011-05-12· cited 28×
- Grassis v. Johns-Manville Corp.New Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1991-05-30· cited 27×
- Krohn v. NJ Full Ins. UnderwritersNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1998-12-08· cited 27×
- Rodd v. Raritan Radiologic Assocs.New Jersey Superior Court App Division· 2004-11-24· cited 25×
- Tronolone v. PalmerNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1988-03-23· cited 22×
- Szczecina v. PV Holding Corp.New Jersey Superior Court App Division· 2010-06-25· cited 22×
- Fineman v. Armstrong World Industries, Inc.D. New Jersey· 1991-06-25· cited 17×
- Jadlowski v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp.New Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1995-07-21· cited 15×
- State v. ShermanNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1988-12-06· cited 14×
- Daisey v. Keene Corp.New Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1993-11-01· cited 13×
- Hofstrom v. ShareNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1996-11-19· cited 13×
Cites
10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Dimick v. SchiedtSupreme Court· 1935-01-07· cited 819×
- Baxter v. Fairmont Food Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey· 1977-10-21· cited 258×
- State v. ThorntonSupreme Court of New Jersey· 1962-10-22· cited 68×
- Fisch v. MangerSupreme Court of New Jersey· 1957-04-01· cited 52×
- TAWEEL v. Starn's Shoprite SupermarketSupreme Court of New Jersey· 1971-05-10· cited 49×
- Fritsche v. Westinghouse Electric Corp.Supreme Court of New Jersey· 1970-02-16· cited 40×
- Haid v. LoderstedtNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1957-07-01· cited 34×
- Tabor v. O'GRADYNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1960-02-03· cited 25×
- Cox v. Valley Fair Corp.Supreme Court of New Jersey· 1980-07-01· cited 13×
- Paxton v. MisiukNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1959-01-20· cited 13×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.