Rodd v. Raritan Radiologic Assocs.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that a mammogram digitally altered and magnified by the plaintiff's attorney was not demonstrative but substantive evidence to prove defendant doctor had negligently failed to diagnose breast cancer
• finding that a mammogram digitally altered and magnified by the plaintiff's attorney was not demonstrative but substantive evidence to prove defendant doctor had negligently failed to diagnose breast cancer
• granting a new trial when an image shown to the jury during closing argument did not reflect evidence and was not disclosed in advance to opposing counsel

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).