· 4/9/2010
Hendry v. Hendry (In Re Hendry)
Citations
- 428 B.R. 68
- 2010 Bankr. LEXIS 1078
- 2010 WL 1437565
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “It is clear, under Docteroff and Grogan, that collateral estoppel may apply here to bar re-litigation of facts or issues previously decided.” (emphasis added)
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Brendan Linehan Shannon
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.