Skip to main content
· 1/7/1985

Henderson v. Hercules, Inc.

Citations

  • 324 S.E.2d 453
  • 253 Ga. 685
  • 1985 Ga. LEXIS 525

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “[I]f a wife’s injury is covered by workers’ compensation, her husband’s common law action for loss of consortium is barred.”
  • wife’s cause of action against injured husband’s employer for loss of consortium barred by exclusive remedy provision and derivative nature of claim
  • legislative intent was to include spouse in exclusive remedy provision of Georgia statute barring claims by “personal representative, parents, dependents, or next of kin”
  • right to recover on claim for loss of consortium is derivative and stems from spouse’s right to recover on his or her cause of action
  • wife’s loss of consortium claim barred by the exclusivity provision because it was derivative of husband’s workers’ compensation claim
  • wife had no derivative claim for loss of consortium because husband’s tort claim barred by Workers’ Compensation Act

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Weltner, Smith

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.