Zaytzeff v. Safety-Kleen Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding wife’s claim for loss of consortium was barred under the Act because the employee would have no tort claim and her claim is derivative of his right
• even though claim not covered by workers’ compensation, the exclusivity provision still bars cause of action
• even though claim not covered by workers' compensation, the exclusivity provision still bars cause of action
• appellant’s claims for psychological injuries were “ ‘inextricably linked’ ” to appellant’s workers’ compensation claim for physical injury or occupational disease
• claim for psychological injuries held inextricably linked to workers’ compensation claim for physical injury

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).